- The global market for 30-50nm TiO2 powders is witnessing a rapid expansion, driven by the increasing demand for eco-friendly and energy-efficient solutions. As a result, manufacturers are constantly exploring new ways to optimize production, enhance functionality, and cater to diverse industry requirements. From tailor-made formulations for specific applications to exploring the potential of TiO2 nanoparticles in next-generation technologies, these manufacturers are at the forefront of shaping the future of nanomaterials.
In terms of manufacturers, there are many companies that produce calcium carbonate and titanium dioxide. Some of the top manufacturers of calcium carbonate include Omya, Imerys, and Minerals Technologies. These companies have large mining operations and production facilities in regions where calcium carbonate is abundant.
calcium carbonate vs titanium dioxide manufacturers

According to brand evaluation and sales, the top five brands of titanium dioxide in 2022 were selected. The top five are Lomon, Panzhihua, Yuxing, CNNC Huayuan (CHTI)and Billions. If you are looking for a good brand of titanium dioxide, then this list of the top five brands of titanium dioxide can be used as a reference for your purchase. We are committed to recommending the titanium dioxide brand with the best reputation and the most real user data, so that you can choose with confidence.


Pigmentary TiO2 particles are approximately 200-350nm in dimension and this form accounts for 98 percent of total production. It is used mainly for light scattering and surface opacity applications. It is used as a base for various colour paints or as a standalone ‘brilliant’ white.
On the other hand, Westerhoff said, there are hundreds of studies showing no adverse effects from the substance.
Lithopone B301
Lithopone in natural and synthetic elastomers

It's also worth noting that even prior to the EU decision, France had already outlawed titanium dioxide in food back in January 2020.
On November 23, 2022, the General Court of the European Union reversed the conclusion that titanium dioxide was carcinogenic and released a statement (1,2):
“First, the Commission made a manifest error in its assessment of the reliability and acceptability of the study on which the classification was based and, second, it infringed the criterion according to which that classification can relate only to a substance that has the intrinsic property to cause cancer.”
As part of our mission at CRIS we base our safety assessments on the currently available scientific evidence and consider many variables (e.g., study quality, journal of publication, etc.), even if it goes against previous conclusions. Evidence-informed decisions making is critical to ensure that the laws and regulations put into place are for the benefit of the population.
The EU General Court maintains that the scientific evidence presented wasn’t the complete picture for the ingredient, “in the present case, the requirement to base the classification of a carcinogenic substance on reliable and acceptable studies was not satisfied.”